Throughout my twelve year coaching career, there have been several topics on deck that have intrigued me.  From the great age-up debate to lowering cutoff times for championship meets, and (of course) the still undying conversation about tech suits.  However, this particular weekend’s deck conversation was one that startled me a bit.  It was an in-depth discussion on how coaches do not change their philosophies over the years.

In giving this a few hours of thought and research, these coaches were absolutely right!  There are countless coaches out there that are doing the same exact thing year after year.  They run the same sets, the same practice structure, the same (if any dry-land), etc etc.  Sure they may be getting good results, but are they truly pushing their swimmers and themselves to grow to their max potential if they stay the same?

If I had to make a general statement, I would say that these coaches are not, and here is why:

  • Efficient stroke technique changes almost on a yearly basis as more advanced technique is researched.
  • Physiological research yields amazing information on energy systems and the potential of the human body.
  • The pool of swimmers changes each and every year which means that alteration of practices, intervals, target times, and the structure of practice groups changes each year.
  • Personally, I have a dire need to not be mundane and predictable which maintains a fun and exciting feel for practices (the loud moans and groans of a hard set included)

So, now that you know my opinion, this opens the debate to the public…

Should swim coaches consistently change their philosophies to adjust to their ever-changing swimmers?  If so, what should they base their changes on (swim times, injuries, team rankings, etc)?

I’m anxious to hear your comments and opinions on the debate so please leave them in the comment section below and let’s get the ball rolling on the debate!

Read More With These